public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Anburaj" <embeddedeng@hotmail.com>
To: rkiran@ipr.res.in, ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] arm based evaluaton board (fwd)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Law15-F9zJAyE63rssK0002568d@hotmail.com> (raw)

Hi Ravi,

Samsung boards are real good. So is Atmel's. It all depends on the speed & 
peripheral needs. If you just need a minimal ARM board, then go for the 
ARM's Eval7T (which has a Samsung's 7TDMI), or the Atmel's EB40.

The ARM9's can run up to 200MHz & the samsung's SMDK 2410 board is a good 
one for the price.

cheers,
-Mike.


>From: Bujji <rkiran@ipr.res.in>
>To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
>Subject: Re: [ECOS] arm based evaluaton board (fwd)
>Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:43:13 -0500 (GMT)
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>sorry for incomplete info.
>we want to have hands on ARM based processor.
>after that we want to compare ARM with POWERPC for our application ,
>whichis a feedback control system of looptime 100us.
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Shobhan Ayyadevara wrote:
>
> > it is depend upon the application that you are going to develop on it ??
> >
> > What is the application that you are going to develop on that ??
> >
> > Shobhan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bujji" <rkiran@ipr.res.in>
> > Cc: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:20 AM
> > Subject: [ECOS] arm based evaluaton board
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we are planning to buy a ARM based evaluation board supported by Ecos.
> > > could somebody suggest me a good Evaluation board.
> > >
> > > Regards and Thanks
> >
>
>Regards and Thanks
>
>
>              **********************************
>                          M.RAVI KIRAN
>                          Engineer-SC
>                SST-1 Operation and Control Group
>                  Institute for Plasma Research
>                  Bhat village,Nr.Indira Bridge
>                   Gandhinagar(Gujarat)-382428.
>			   INDIA
>		Phone : +91-079-3969001-15
>			ext: 259/412/316
>		Fax   : +91-079-3969017
>		Mail  : rkiran@ipr.res.in
>              **********************************
>
>
>
>--
>Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
>and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get holiday tips for festive fun. 
http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

             reply	other threads:[~2003-12-10 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-10 16:30 Michael Anburaj [this message]
2003-12-13 19:47 ` Bujji
2003-12-14 20:51   ` Gary Thomas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-10  8:21 Bujji

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Law15-F9zJAyE63rssK0002568d@hotmail.com \
    --to=embeddedeng@hotmail.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rkiran@ipr.res.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).