From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18357 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2003 08:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18349 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 08:55:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.tecon.ru) (81.211.46.134) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 08:55:26 -0000 Received: from there ([192.168.2.43]) by mail.tecon.ru with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:55:24 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" From: Aleksei Makarov To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:55:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2003 08:55:24.0373 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F101050:01C3BE32] Subject: [ECOS] about ARM vectors.S X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 Hi I look at hal/arm/arch/current/src/vectors.S, cvs version 1.45 (up-to-date), lines 931-959. The function interrupt_end() is called there in any case, whether it was the last nested interrupt or not. Is it true? If it is true, is it correct? (As I know this function may call DSR and cause a thread switch) Aleksei Makarov -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss