From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Grant Whitacre" <Grant.Whitacre@motorola.com>
To: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [ECOS] question about GCC for Arm Installation
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <NEBBIFNJGGGGCNAAADNOGEADCIAA.Grant.Whitacre@motorola.com>
References: <3B5F0F44.DDB1DE57@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00799.html

I recently downloaded and built the dev tools for Arm development -- GCC
(2.95.2), binary utilities (2.10.1) and insight (5.0).  Everything seems to
get built just fine but when I try to do a minimum eCos build with default
settings using the Configuration tool (1.3.1), I get error messages:

make[1]: Entering directory
`/c/Coldfire/eCos/MyBuilds/MinimalForArm3_build/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1'
arm-elf-gcc -mcpu=arm7tdmi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Winlin
e -Wundef -Woverloaded-virtual -g -O2 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -f
no-rtti -fno-exceptions -fvtable-gc -finit-priority  -I//C/Coldfire/eCos/MyB
uilds/MinimalForArm3_install/include -I//c/coldfire/ecos/packages/hal/arm/ar
ch/v1_3_1 -I//c/coldfire/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1/src -I//c/coldfir
e/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1/tests -I. -Wp,-MD,arm.tmp -o
hal_mk_defs.tmp -S
//c/coldfire/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1/src/hal_mk_defs.c
cc1.exe: Invalid option `-Woverloaded-virtual'
cc1.exe: Invalid option `-fno-rtti'
cc1.exe: Invalid option `-fvtable-gc'
cc1.exe: Invalid option `-finit-priority'
//c/coldfire/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1/src/hal_mk_defs.c: In
function `main':
//c/coldfire/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1/src/hal_mk_defs.c:105:
warning: control reaches end of non-void function
make[1]: *** [arm.inc] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/c/Coldfire/eCos/MyBuilds/MinimalForArm3_build/hal/arm/arch/v1_3_1'
make: *** [build] Error 2


I've followed the installation procedure exactly as described on the
"Building the ARM development tools for Windows" site.  I've also tried
upgrading to the latest versions of the tools (GCC-v3.0 and
binutil-v2.11.2), but I get the same results.  Does anyone have any ideas?
Do I need anything else - like newlib or gcc-g++?  (I tried to download the
latter but this folder on all the mirror sites was unavailable).

Thanks,
Grant