RE: [ECOS] Kinetis TWR-K60N512-KIT questions

[jjp jjp <jackoaway@hotmail.com>]

Hi,
I have a TWR-K60N512 too!
Is it possible to apply patchs to Mercurial version?
(CVS is blocked and I ask my admin to free it)
Actually, I clone the repository using informations from
http://www.ecoscentric.com/devzone/snapshots.shtml and actual
changeset is 3029:9aec6a8ff9b9.
Regards.

----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:54:49 +0200
> From: ilijak@siva.com.mk
> To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Kinetis TWR-K60N512-KIT questions
>
> On 13.04.2011 10:01, jjp jjp wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I modify the code according to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5340&action=diff
> > which is same bug you are talking about.
>
> It is the same bug, but the patch is obsoleted by a new one. Pse revisit
> the bug.
>
> > I will begin to test your HAL as soon as possible (maybe tomorrow).
> Can you tell me what platform HW do you test on?
> Especially what is your clock source (unless it is TWR-K60N512)?
>
> > Regards.
> > Note : I'm using cortex-m3 support on Zylin zy1000.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:08:56 +0200
> >> From: ilijak@siva.com.mk
> >> To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
> >> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Kinetis TWR-K60N512-KIT questions
> >>
> >> Hi again
> >>
> >> In meantime I have built gnutools arround GCC 4.6.0:
> >> gcc-4.6.0
> >> newlib-1.19.0
> >> binutils-2.21.51 (+ OS patch, see note below)
> >> gdb-7.2
> >>
> >> First tests are encouraging, I was able to get "Hello world" with both
> >> HAL and devs serial driver.
> >>
> >> Note regarding binutils-2.21.51:
> >>
> >>> -. binutils-2.21.51 (patched snaphot with OS
> >>> support for cortex-m4)
> >>
> >> I don't quite figure out whether you mean that you downloaded
> >> binutils-2.21.51 already patched or you have applied the patch. I
> >> downloaded binutils-2.21.51 today and it is didn't have the OS patch,
> >> (Btw it seem to have been committed yesterday):
> >> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12296
> >>
> >> However gcc-4.6.0 works for Cortex-M4, or at least for Kinetis - with
> >> both -mcpu=cortex-m4 and -mcpu=cortex-m3.
> >>
> >> I am looking forward to your tests.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Ilija
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11.04.2011 09:42, jjp jjp wrote:
> >>> Hi Ilija,
> >>> I can't test it before wednesday.
> >>> I will give you feedbacks as soon as possible.
> >>> Regards.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:09:05 +0200
> >>> From: ilijak@siva.com.mk
> >>> To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
> >>> CC: jackoaway@hotmail.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Kinetis TWR-K60N512-KIT questions
> >>>
> >>> Hi jjp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank for question, you are coming in right time, A week ago I
> >>> placed Kinetis port on Bugzilla.
> >>>
> >>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001187
> >>>
> >>> I'll appreciate if you try it and come with feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Note:You need to commit latest version from CVS as it has bugs
> >>> 1001184, 1001186 integrated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am using official eCos 3.0 tools (-m3 of course) in order to
> >>> maintain compatibility, but I am keen to try gcc 4.6.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Ilija
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 08.04.2011 16:42, jjp jjp wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi list,
> >>>
> >>> I am doing some tiny tests with k60 and I have some troubles to
> >>> make SVC call running properly.
> >>>
> >>> Vector table is set at 0x20000000 in register SCB_VTOR, psp and
> >>> msp have different adresses in RAM.
> >>>
> >>> I always get an HardFault after __asm__("svc 0");
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Check if VTOR setting is as desired, 0x20000000 should work. Also
> >>> stack, what do you have in mlt files?
> >>>
> >>> Ilija, is it working properly for you?
> >>>
> >>> I'm using :
> >>>
> >>> -. gcc-4.6.0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -. binutils-2.21.51 (patched snaphot with OS
> >>> support for cortex-m4)
> >>>
> >>> -. zylin zy1000 (revB 1.66)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nice to see that Zylin supports Kinetis too.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:01:15 +0100
> >>>> From: ilijak@siva.com.mk
> >>>> To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Kinetis TWR-K60N512-KIT questions
> >>>> On 27.01.2011 10:09, jjp jjp wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> I follow very closely the port of Ilija Kocho on Kinetis
> >>> TWR-K60N512-KIT and
> >>>
> >>>>> I have some questions about your development methods :
> >>>> Hello, and thanks for your interest.
> >>>>> What cross compiler tools are you using (arm-eabi-gcc
> >>> v-4.3 with patchs for cortex-m4)?
> >>>
> >>>>> What kind of debugging tools are you using?
> >>>> Cortex-M4 is binary and backward compatible with M3 so, for
> >>> the time
> >>>
> >>>> being you can use current compiler, of course you can't use
> >>> Cortex-M4
> >>>
> >>>> specific features. Or you can try forthcoming 4.6.
> >>>>> I don't see debug tools (except libSWD with OpenOCD) in
> >>> Free and Open Source Software community trying
> >>>
> >>>>> to get debug by Serial Wire Debug.
> >>>> Kinetis is very new, not yet in regular production so many
> >>> tools are not
> >>>
> >>>> yet prepared. I don't know if OpenOCD supports Kinetis. In
> >>> our lab we
> >>>
> >>>> have Ronetix PEEDI that is just getting Kinetis support. In
> >>> meantime we
> >>>
> >>>> are working "dry" :(
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Ilija
> >>>> --
> >>>> Before posting, please read the FAQ:
> >>> http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> >>>
> >>>> and search the list archive:
> >>> http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> >> and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
>
 		 	   		  

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss