From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gary Thomas <gthomas@redhat.com>
To: Fabrice Gautier <Fabrice_Gautier@sdesigns.com>
Cc: "Ecos-List (E-mail)" <ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: RE: [ECOS] Ethernet dsr and Redboot
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 10:02:00 -0000
Message-id: <XFMail.20001014111307.gthomas@redhat.com>
References: <8AE4B526B977D411841F00A0CC334020052C9E@cuz-exchange.sdesigns.net>
X-SW-Source: 2000-10/msg00152.html

On 14-Oct-2000 Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At the end of the eth_dsr function, eth_drv_dsr is called. eth_drv_dsr is
> defined twice, in io/eth/current/src/net/eth_drv.c and
> io/eth/current/src/stand_alone/eth_drv.c. Unlike many other function defined
> in those two packages this function is not defined in redboot.
> 
> So I wonder which of this is called?
> 
> It doesn't seems to be the one in "net" because i can't find the
> "ecos_synch_eth_drv_dsr" function (which is called by this dsr) in the
> symbol listing.
> 
> On the other hand, the other eth_drv_dsr should print "eth_drv_dsr should
> not be called".
> What does that means?
> Does this means that the ethernet stack in redboot doesn't use any
> interrupts??

RedBoot does not use interrupts.