public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: Huang Qiang <jameshq@liverpool.ac.uk>
Cc: eCos <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [ECOS] Question About "Clock Hardware Initialization Value"
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 05:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20010423064512.gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <KIEBICHBADHFCLGCKOPDKEENCBAA.jameshq@liv.ac.uk>

On 23-Apr-2001 Huang Qiang wrote:
> Hi all:
>    I am configuring the tick time for the ecos. I met with a clock hardware
> initialization value option in the ecos configuration tool. It recommend to
> refer to the hardware reference. Does it mean the target platform or the
> microprocessor's manual? I am currently using the ARM Evaluator7T Board for
> developing. What is this value used to do?

The answer to this depends on the actual hardware platform.  Sometimes the
hardware (registers, timers, etc) used for the tick timer are on the processor
(in the case of the Evaluator), other times it is implemented in separate
logic on the target board.

In your case, look at the E7T documentation on the internal timers to figure
out what the value should be.  You can probably get some idea from seeing the
current value.

Specifically for the Evaluator, the timer is clocked by the system clock, so
the "period" value is simply the system clock divided by the timer rate.  In
the current CDL, these values are calculated, so in order to change them you'll
have to edit the CDL file directly.

      reply	other threads:[~2001-04-23  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-23  2:47 [ECOS] Question About "Clock Hardware Initialization Value" Option? Huang Qiang
2001-04-23  5:45 ` Gary Thomas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=XFMail.20010423064512.gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jameshq@liverpool.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).