From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12868 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2009 16:05:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2009 16:05:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cpanel5.proisp.no (HELO cpanel5.proisp.no) (209.85.100.29) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:04:56 +0000 Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.220.223]:49359) by cpanel5.proisp.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N0dg5-0001Eq-7L for ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:04:45 +0200 Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so8453658fxm.30 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:04:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.143.79 with SMTP id t15mr1574851fau.6.1256141088313; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:04:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091021154001.GA4391@sg-laptop> References: <20091021140357.GA18725@sg-ubuntu.local> <20091021154001.GA4391@sg-laptop> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=98yvind_Harboe?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=98yvind_Harboe?= , eCos Disuss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] extern __inline__ and optimisation problems X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 > Hm, I do not expect that it's possible to mix native host archive > (libopenocd.a) is built using host headers/glibc and eCos archives > (libtarget.a, libextras.a) are built with eCos headers/libc even for > Linux synthetic target together. I'm not (willingly) mixing host and eCos stuff. I'm crossbuilding using autotools to eCos binaries. This works fine for my arm-elf target, but something goes haywire with arm-eabi and gcc. I suspect that it might be a gcc 3 vs. gcc 4 problem. My suspicion is that I've got one option too many or too little... --=20 =C3=98yvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss