From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16802 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2017 23:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15827 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2017 23:35:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:590, price, Stano, H*RU:sk:78-141- X-HELO: meduna.org Received: from www.meduna.org (HELO meduna.org) (92.240.244.38) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:35:19 +0000 Received: from 78-141-77-45.dynamic.orange.sk ([78.141.77.45] helo=[192.168.130.22]) by meduna.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOY6e-00010S-7Z for ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:35:16 +0200 To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <594CFA8F.5A21B5.01235@m15-112.126.com> From: Stanislav Meduna Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: stano@meduna.org X-Authenticator: dovecot_plain X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: -28 X-Exim-Version: 4.84_2 (build at 07-Jan-2017 03:22:22) X-Date: 2017-06-24 01:35:16 X-Connected-IP: 78.141.77.45:55184 X-Message-Linecount: 33 X-Body-Linecount: 16 X-Message-Size: 1272 X-Body-Size: 591 X-Received-Count: 1 X-Recipient-Count: 1 X-Local-Recipient-Count: 1 X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0 X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Subject: Re: [ECOS] ecos project still alive? X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 On 23.6.2017 18:57, PicassoCT wrote: > Many successful and completed projects are in maintenance mode. Having one network stack (BSD) from 2002 and another (lwIP) from 2009 does not look like a maintenance mode to me. It could well be that the eCosPro lives. This is however in a price range where there are several alternatives to explore. I completely respect the eCosCentric's decision not to move forward with the public version, but as a free OS I'm afraid the eCos is dead, as there is obviously no relevant community to contribute. -- Stano -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss