From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16857 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2008 15:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16487 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jul 2008 15:07:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (HELO yx-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.44.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:06:51 +0000 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so244612yxf.66 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.169.2 with SMTP id r2mr563159wae.132.1215097608583; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.18 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:07:00 -0000 From: Alexandre Reply-To: thekyz@gmail.com To: Alexandre , "eCos Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080703101011.GC27831@lunn.ch> <20080703140339.GG27831@lunn.ch> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow? X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Alexandre wrote: > TRACE: intr.cxx [ 86] Cyg_Interrupt::Cyg_Interrupt() > ((vector=7, > priority=4, data=40000860, isr=000049ec, dsr=00004a3c)) Let's try to advance by myself :) CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART1 is interrupt 7 so there must be an error around this. Can't both UARTs use the same priority level & if not, how can I change that ? -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss