From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30501 invoked by alias); 26 May 2005 13:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30457 invoked by uid 22791); 26 May 2005 13:57:22 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:57:22 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DbIlK-0000tP-Df for ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 26 May 2005 15:51:03 +0200 Received: from iv.ro ([194.105.28.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 15:51:02 +0200 Received: from jani by iv.ro with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 15:51:02 +0200 To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com From: Jani Monoses Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) Subject: [ECOS] gcc4.0 errors X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 Hello with gcc4.0 for ARM I needed to remove -mno-short-load-words and -finit-priorities since support for switches was removed (the former removed already in 3.4) Is there any reason for keeping them around? From what I read -finit-priorities was ignored by gcc anyway and no-short-loads (or malignment-traps as it is known in gcc 3.4) is neede only on pre ARMv4 architectures. There are a few other warnings, mostly signedness differences in function arguments passing throughout the sources. Jani -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss