From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21721 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2007 04:57:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 21708 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2007 04:57:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 04:57:47 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so812409fkx for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr5339097bud.1188622664032; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.238.10 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 04:57:00 -0000 From: "Tobias Nielsen" To: ecos-discuss@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] AT91SAM7S-EK X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 I am working with an AT91SAM7S256 processor on an AT91SAM7S-EK development board. I have downloaded the very recent installer from ecos and run the appropriate tcl install script. But now as i try to make a build tree for my processor, it seems there is no target that fits. I have tried the at91 target, but even though the processor specifications seems to be okay, my memory footprint seems to be rather wrong when i track down the mappings file: (install/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_at91_eb40_rom.ldi) I have just for the sake of it tried to alter it to fit my memory settings and this off course also spawns of a new series of errors.. But i believe that this approach is basically wrong - especially since i have searched through a lot of queries on the subject and here have found that there used to be a target that was named at91sam7s.. - but its not there anymore... :-( Is there something obvious that i simply have completely missed? -- Yours kindly Tobias Nielsen -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss