From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4455 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2007 11:32:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 4393 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2007 11:31:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:31:43 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a25so4965241pyi.11 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.158.17 with SMTP id g17mr814522wfe.127.1197891098465; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:31:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.251.9 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:31:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:03:00 -0000 From: "Tom Deconinck" To: "eCos Disuss" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: Idle timeout and maximum # of sockets for athttpd X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 On Dec 13, 2007 4:14 PM, =D8yvind Harboe wrote: > [the awful truth deleted] > > Now I understand the awful truth. I wonder if there is anything that > could be done > to clue other athttpd users onto that they need to increase # of > sockets to avoid > the waiting problem.... > > > -- > =D8yvind Harboe > http://www.zylin.com - eCos ARM & FPGA developer kit > > -- > > Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > > Hi, Just a thought: maybe you can disable the socket linger timeout (=3Dthe time it waits to completely close a socket). I've done it in the past on Linux, so I don't know if you can do it with the eCos networking stack. Or you can try resetting a socket when you know it's closed, it's a violation of normal way of working, but if it does the trick... Tom -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss