From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8211 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2009 20:26:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 8191 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2009 20:26:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:09 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MGfEK-0003TG-C0 for ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:04 +0000 Received: from 69.34.67.62 ([69.34.67.62]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:04 +0000 Received: from grante by 69.34.67.62 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:04 +0000 To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com From: Grant Edwards Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <4A37F8F9.4000306@mlbassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-102 (Linux) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] Re: How to send UDP broadcast to 255.255.255.255? X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 On 2009-06-16, Gary Thomas wrote: > Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2009-06-16, Jay Foster wrote: >> >>> You can try the following patch that someone added to my local source. It >>> adds a CDL option (CYGOPT_NET_INET_FORCE_DIRECTED_BROADCAST) to modify this >>> behavior (the default being the same behavior you have now). Sorry it isn't >>> in "patch" format, but it is straight forward. What is not shown here is >>> configuring this option to '0' in your applications .ecm or template file. >> >> Thanks. I'll have to check to see if the need for the feature >> is significant enough to justify forking the network stack >> (something I'm pretty ruluctant to do). > > If this works and is useful to you, we can just check it in. > After all, it's controlled by CDL, so the default behaviour > will remain the same. Cool. I'll check to see if it's something we still need to do. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I smell like a wet at reducing clinic on Columbus visi.com Day! -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss