public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* AW: [ECOS] Blocking restricted in DSRs
@ 2004-07-27  8:47 Neundorf, Alexander
  2004-07-27  8:55 ` Nick Garnett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neundorf, Alexander @ 2004-07-27  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bob.koninckx, ecos-discuss

 
> Things like waiting for a semaphore. Blocking is something you do at
> thread level. The thread "blocks" (or goes to sleep) until another
> thread or interrupt wakes it up again. Basically, this waking 
> up is done
> by the scheduler, which explains why you should not block in a DSR,
> which is called _before_ the scheduler. 
> 
> Hope this makes it a little bit clearer,
> 
> Bob

Ok, the docu says sending signals to condition variables is ok from a DSR. But AFAIK this has always be done together with locking the associated mutex first... from the DSR then. But the docu also says using cyg_mutex_lock() should be used only from thread context, not from DSR. So, what's the right way then ?

Alex

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: AW: [ECOS] Blocking restricted in DSRs
  2004-07-27  8:47 AW: [ECOS] Blocking restricted in DSRs Neundorf, Alexander
@ 2004-07-27  8:55 ` Nick Garnett
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Garnett @ 2004-07-27  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neundorf, Alexander; +Cc: bob.koninckx, ecos-discuss

"Neundorf, Alexander" <Alexander.Neundorf@jenoptik.com> writes:

>  
> > Things like waiting for a semaphore. Blocking is something you do at
> > thread level. The thread "blocks" (or goes to sleep) until another
> > thread or interrupt wakes it up again. Basically, this waking 
> > up is done
> > by the scheduler, which explains why you should not block in a DSR,
> > which is called _before_ the scheduler. 
> > 
> > Hope this makes it a little bit clearer,
> > 
> > Bob
> 
> Ok, the docu says sending signals to condition variables is ok from
> a DSR. But AFAIK this has always be done together with locking the
> associated mutex first... from the DSR then. But the docu also says
> using cyg_mutex_lock() should be used only from thread context, not
> from DSR. So, what's the right way then ?

It also says that cyg_mutex_signal() can be called without locking the
associated mutex first. This is how it must be used from the DSR.


-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: AW: [ECOS] Blocking restricted in DSRs
  2004-07-27 16:50 Neundorf, Alexander
@ 2004-07-27 17:06 ` Nick Garnett
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Garnett @ 2004-07-27 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neundorf, Alexander; +Cc: ecos-discuss

"Neundorf, Alexander" <Alexander.Neundorf@jenoptik.com> writes:

> ...
> > Threads can call blocking functions with the scheduler locked. The
> > lock is essentially a per-thread variable so when the thread is
> > resumed the lock is returned to its former value.
> 
> IOW cyg_scheduler_lock() ensures that the scheduler doesn't run as
> long as the thread which called cyg_scheduler_lock() doesn't call a
> synchronization function which calls itself the scheduler, right ?
>

Correct.

> But still I don't understand the code.  cyg_scheduler_lock() calls
> Cyg_Scheduler::lock() in sched.inl, which calls
> inc_sched_lock(). This I find in smp.hxx. I don't see any thread
> specific data there, so how can this act thread-specific ?

The next lock value is passed as an argument to unlock_inner() and is
therefore saved across the context switch on the stack and set when
then thread is rescheduled. That is why I said "essentially", since it
is not stored explicitly in the thread object.

-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* AW: [ECOS] Blocking restricted in DSRs
@ 2004-07-27 16:50 Neundorf, Alexander
  2004-07-27 17:06 ` Nick Garnett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neundorf, Alexander @ 2004-07-27 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Garnett, ecos-discuss


...
> Threads can call blocking functions with the scheduler locked. The
> lock is essentially a per-thread variable so when the thread is
> resumed the lock is returned to its former value.

IOW cyg_scheduler_lock() ensures that the scheduler doesn't run as long as the thread which called cyg_scheduler_lock() doesn't call a synchronization function which calls itself the scheduler, right ?

But still I don't understand the code.
cyg_scheduler_lock() calls Cyg_Scheduler::lock() in sched.inl, which calls inc_sched_lock(). This I find in smp.hxx. I don't see any thread specific data there, so how can this act thread-specific ?

Thanks
Alex

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-27 16:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-27  8:47 AW: [ECOS] Blocking restricted in DSRs Neundorf, Alexander
2004-07-27  8:55 ` Nick Garnett
2004-07-27 16:50 Neundorf, Alexander
2004-07-27 17:06 ` Nick Garnett

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).