From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67307 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2017 23:27:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 67296 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2017 23:27:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:Unknown, D*126.com, H*u:1.0.2, H*UA:1.0.2 X-HELO: blaine.gmane.org Received: from Unknown (HELO blaine.gmane.org) (195.159.176.226) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:27:18 +0000 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOXyn-0001eg-FH for ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:27:09 +0200 To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org From: Grant Edwards Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <594CFA8F.5A21B5.01235@m15-112.126.com> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) X-IsSubscribed: yes Subject: [ECOS] Re: ecos project still alive? X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 2017-06-23, Alex Schuilenburg wrote: > On 23/06/17 16:41, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2017-06-23, 15802542327 <15802542327@126.com> wrote: >> >>> last update has been than 2 years. is this project still alive? >> That depends on your definition of "alive". It isn't really being >> actively developed. I wouldn't use it for a new project, but it still >> works well enough that I'm not looking to port my product firmware to >> a different RTOS. > > I strongly disagree - it is being continually developed. eCos forms > part of eCosPro and both are continually being developed with new > targets, platforms and functionality routinely being developed and > added. eCosPro 4.0 was released last year and eCosPro 4.1 will be > released shortly (already shipping beta to specific customers). > > I fully accept that the public version of eCos has suffered from a > distinct lack of contributions Based on his "last update has been than 2 years" comment and the forum in which he asked his question, I thought it was obvious that he was asking about the public eCos. -- Grant -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss