From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesper Skov <jskov@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: Andre Sebastien <sebastien.andre@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr>
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] RedBoot RAM version problem
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:20:00 -0000
Message-id: <otr8v2wlvp.fsf@zoftcorp.adsl.dk>
References: <20010726164916.A32626@frequentis.com> <XFMail.20010726094929.gthomas@redhat.com> <20010726181816.A22820@frequentis.com> <86n15rzgxw.fsf@halftrack.hq.acn-group.ch> <20010727082554.A12744@frequentis.com> <8666ceamvl.fsf@halftrack.hq.acn-group.ch> <20010727102736.A12982@frequentis.com> <3B61392C.651064D2@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr> <oty9pahd7d.fsf@zoftcorp.adsl.dk> <3B615C3B.CCD67AAE@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00877.html

>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Sebastien <sebastien.andre@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr> writes:

Andre> Yes it s this flash device that i have (AT29C040A) !!!!  What
Andre> does it wrong ?

Dunno. I remember we had a similar problem with one of the boards in
our test farm, but I never got around to investigate.

The problem is that the device ID returned by the device when queried
is not what the driver expects. See flash_hwr_init in
devs/flash/atmel/at29cxxxx/current/include/flash_at29cxxxx.inl.

Jesper