From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16693 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 08:06:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16632 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2005 08:06:25 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:06:25 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DnXTJ-0001hc-IU for ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:59:01 +0200 Received: from tbnb-165-204-239.telkomadsl.co.za ([165.165.204.239]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:59:01 +0200 Received: from jeigelaar by tbnb-165-204-239.telkomadsl.co.za with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:59:01 +0200 To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com From: John Eigelaar Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050629161718.01dcc700@mail.au.varianinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Subject: [ECOS] Re: AT91RM9200-EK Port X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:19:59 +1000, stewart hamilton wrote: > Hi John > > I know its early days yet. But as we are just about to embark on an > evaluation of ecos on the > AT91RM9200-EK board and have no previous ecos experience, was wondering how > your port to this board is going > > Regards > Stewart Stewart, I haven't actually started yet. I have spent the last two days inspecting the ARM HAL structure. The AT91RM9200 present a bit of a conundrum - it is a an at91 part as well as an arm9 part. At this point I am not sure whether to start it as an at91 variant and use the stuff from the arm9 HAL as well, or start with an arm9 platfrom and just use the at91 variants a e reference. At this point in time I am leaning towards the arm9 starting point just because stuff like cahces and MMU controllers has already been used in these platforms. Please keep in touch, might be nice to share the experience. John -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss