public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Garnett <nickg@cygnus.co.uk>
To: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] No binary semaphore in C API?
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wwghf0glpyc.fsf@balti.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AB67D44.AFB5E10D@redhat.com>

Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com> writes:

> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > 
> > So, I wanted to use binary semaphores, but can't find the API.
> > The program is using counting semaphores right now, but using a
> > binary ones would be a bit more "defensive".
> > 
> > Is there a technical reason that there isn't a C API for binary
> > semaphores, or is it something that just hasn't been done yet?
> 
> Certainly no technical reason. Nick may not have done it out of principle.
> But right now he's on vacation, so it's best to wait till he returns.
> 

It was never intended that the KAPI be a complete reflection of the
kernel implementation. It is meant to be a consistent, self-contained,
small API that can be used by C applications. Like the uITRON and
POSIX APIs it only exposes a subset. It was considered unnecessary to
export binary semaphores, since a counting semaphore initialized to 1
is functionally equivalent.

If I had had my way the KAPI would have been even more minimal that it
currently is.

-- 
Nick Garnett, eCos Kernel Architect
Red Hat, Cambridge, UK

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-26  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-16 12:01 Grant Edwards
2001-03-19 13:42 ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-03-26  3:53   ` Nick Garnett [this message]
2001-03-26  7:12     ` Fabrice Gautier
2001-03-26 11:37     ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-27  2:00       ` Nick Garnett
2001-03-27  5:32         ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-28  5:29         ` Bart Veer
2001-03-28  6:45           ` Sergei Organov
2001-03-28  7:38             ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-28  7:39             ` Bart Veer
2001-03-28 10:01               ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-03-28 10:01               ` Sergei Organov
2001-03-28 11:05                 ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-29 11:51                   ` Sergei Organov
2001-03-29 11:49                     ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-29 11:55           ` Chris Gray
2001-03-29 19:33             ` Bart Veer
2001-03-29 20:50               ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-30  2:22               ` Sergei Organov
2001-03-30  6:54                 ` Grant Edwards
2001-03-30  7:42                   ` Sergei Organov
2001-03-30  5:39 Rosimildo daSilva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wwghf0glpyc.fsf@balti.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=nickg@cygnus.co.uk \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).