public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugo Tyson <hmt@redhat.com>
To: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] DHCP w/ Win2K server?
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 06:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wwtvgfsttu3.fsf@masala.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "Dan Conti"'s message of "Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:09:59 -0800"


"Dan Conti" <danc@iobjects.com> writes:
> Unfortunately my eCos version is a bit outdated at this point, so if i
> gave you a patch it almost certainly wouldn't apply properly.

OK, I'll get something together for the trunk.

I believe it will be good to add that tag to all *FOUR* places DHCP sends a
packet, DHCPSTATE_REQUESTING, RENEWING, REBINDING and the initial broadcast
one in INIT.  'Course I'll test it, but only with LINUX dhcpd.  Comments?

I'll place a patch which should be good for anoncvs here.

	- Huge
 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hugo Tyson [mailto:hmt@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:17 AM
> > To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com; hmt@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [ECOS] DHCP w/ Win2K server?
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > "Dan Conti" <danc@iobjects.com> writes:
> > > Sorry, you will need to add a similar line for the RENEWING and
> > > REBINDING cases in dhcp.
> >=20
> > > In net/tcpip/current/src/lib/dhcp_prot.c, around line 596 (in case
> > > DHCPSTATE_REQUESTING), try adding the following line:
> > >
> > > 	    set_fixed_tag( xmit, TAG_DHCP_PARM_REQ_LIST,=20
> > TAG_GATEWAY, 1 );
> > >
> > > to add the gateway request to the DHCP packet.=20
> >=20
> > Thanks folks.  Shall I see to it and post a patch or will one=20
> > of you come
> > up with a complete patch including ChangeLog? =20
> >=20
> > 	- Huge

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Hugo Tyson <hmt@redhat.com>
To: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] DHCP w/ Win2K server?
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 02:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wwtvgfsttu3.fsf@masala.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011130025200.Z2n3bdNnN-EikbpdTIZlbG9xhUEae_SAbDnPWZHW9vU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D8DFF0AFE792914996F997E68FEC3A48F4C7@bunker.iobjects.com>

"Dan Conti" <danc@iobjects.com> writes:
> Unfortunately my eCos version is a bit outdated at this point, so if i
> gave you a patch it almost certainly wouldn't apply properly.

OK, I'll get something together for the trunk.

I believe it will be good to add that tag to all *FOUR* places DHCP sends a
packet, DHCPSTATE_REQUESTING, RENEWING, REBINDING and the initial broadcast
one in INIT.  'Course I'll test it, but only with LINUX dhcpd.  Comments?

I'll place a patch which should be good for anoncvs here.

	- Huge
 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hugo Tyson [ mailto:hmt@redhat.com ]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:17 AM
> > To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com; hmt@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [ECOS] DHCP w/ Win2K server?
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > "Dan Conti" <danc@iobjects.com> writes:
> > > Sorry, you will need to add a similar line for the RENEWING and
> > > REBINDING cases in dhcp.
> >=20
> > > In net/tcpip/current/src/lib/dhcp_prot.c, around line 596 (in case
> > > DHCPSTATE_REQUESTING), try adding the following line:
> > >
> > > 	    set_fixed_tag( xmit, TAG_DHCP_PARM_REQ_LIST,=20
> > TAG_GATEWAY, 1 );
> > >
> > > to add the gateway request to the DHCP packet.=20
> >=20
> > Thanks folks.  Shall I see to it and post a patch or will one=20
> > of you come
> > up with a complete patch including ChangeLog? =20
> >=20
> > 	- Huge

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-30 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-22  4:33 Dan Conti
2001-11-23  6:21 ` Hugo Tyson [this message]
2001-11-23  6:49   ` [ECOS] Is it the right forum? sandeep
2001-11-30  3:06     ` sandeep
2001-11-23  7:44   ` [ECOS] DHCP w/ Win2K server? Hugo Tyson
2001-11-25 19:40     ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-25 20:38       ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-25 23:57         ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-30  9:28           ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-30  9:17         ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-30  9:05       ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-30  5:12     ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-24  4:58   ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-30  7:08     ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-30  2:52   ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-29 13:10 ` Dan Conti
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-26  4:05 Dan Conti
2001-11-30 12:17 ` Dan Conti
2001-11-19  3:01 Dan Conti
2001-11-22  4:27 ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-29 10:18   ` Hugo Tyson
2001-11-28 14:40 ` Dan Conti
2001-11-19  2:48 Dan Conti
2001-11-19  3:50 ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-28 14:56   ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-28 14:39 ` Dan Conti
2001-11-19  2:02 Grant Edwards
2001-11-19  2:55 ` Gary Thomas
2001-11-19  3:48   ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-28 14:44     ` Grant Edwards
2001-11-28 14:39   ` Gary Thomas
2001-11-28 14:30 ` Grant Edwards

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wwtvgfsttu3.fsf@masala.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=hmt@redhat.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).