public inbox for ecos-maintainers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
       [not found] <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909019173AD@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
@ 2009-06-10 19:42 ` Gary Thomas
  2009-06-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Larmour
  2009-08-07 15:36   ` John Dallaway
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2009-06-10 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
> 
> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
> 

AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-06-10 19:42 ` Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Gary Thomas
@ 2009-06-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Larmour
  2009-06-15  1:19     ` Gary Thomas
  2009-08-07 15:36   ` John Dallaway
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-06-14 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

Gary Thomas wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> 
>>Hello all,
>>
>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>
>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>
> 
> 
> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.

Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never made 
an assignment.

Jifl
-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-06-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2009-06-15  1:19     ` Gary Thomas
  2009-09-16 21:31       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2009-06-15  1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>
>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
> 
> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
> made an assignment.

They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
time to search right now).

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-06-10 19:42 ` Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Gary Thomas
  2009-06-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2009-08-07 15:36   ` John Dallaway
  2009-08-07 15:53     ` Austin, Brian
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-08-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Austin; +Cc: eCos Maintainers

Hi Brian

We continue to receive queries about the eCos port to EP93xx hardware
but we have not yet received notification from the FSF that the
copyright assignment and company disclaimer are in place.

Sometimes notifications from the FSF can be delayed or lost. Can you
please confirm that these documents were definitely submitted to the FSF
as described at:

  http://ecos.sourceware.org/assign.html

Thank you

John Dallaway
eCos Maintainer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-08-07 15:36   ` John Dallaway
@ 2009-08-07 15:53     ` Austin, Brian
  2009-08-07 16:19       ` John Dallaway
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Austin, Brian @ 2009-08-07 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Dallaway; +Cc: eCos Maintainers

Hi John,

Sorry for the delay.  I was involved in a bicycle accident and have been
out of the office for some time. I have the forms here with me and will
mail them off.

Sorry again for the delay,
Brian Austin

-----Original Message-----
From: John Dallaway [mailto:john@dallaway.org.uk] 
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:36 AM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: eCos Maintainers
Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

Hi Brian

We continue to receive queries about the eCos port to EP93xx hardware
but we have not yet received notification from the FSF that the
copyright assignment and company disclaimer are in place.

Sometimes notifications from the FSF can be delayed or lost. Can you
please confirm that these documents were definitely submitted to the FSF
as described at:

  http://ecos.sourceware.org/assign.html

Thank you

John Dallaway
eCos Maintainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-08-07 15:53     ` Austin, Brian
@ 2009-08-07 16:19       ` John Dallaway
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-08-07 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Austin, Brian; +Cc: eCos Maintainers

Hi Brian

Austin, Brian wrote:

> Sorry for the delay.  I was involved in a bicycle accident and have been
> out of the office for some time. I have the forms here with me and will
> mail them off.

Thanks for the speedy reply. Take it easy...

John Dallaway

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-06-15  1:19     ` Gary Thomas
@ 2009-09-16 21:31       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-17  8:54         ` John Dallaway
  2009-09-17 20:54         ` Jonathan Larmour
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-16 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gary Thomas, Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>
>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>> 
>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>> made an assignment.
>
> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
> time to search right now).

Does anyone know the status of this?

I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
original patch is still not in CVS.

Thanks for your time,
Hartley

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-09-16 21:31       ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-09-17  8:54         ` John Dallaway
  2009-09-17 20:54         ` Jonathan Larmour
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-09-17  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: eCos Maintainers

Hi Hartley

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:

> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>
>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>>> made an assignment.
>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
>> time to search right now).
> 
> Does anyone know the status of this?
> 
> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
> original patch is still not in CVS.

I contacted the contributor 2009-08-07. The assignment paperwork had
been unavoidably delayed for due to ill health. We are anticipating
confirmation of this assignment at any time now.

John Dallaway

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-09-16 21:31       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-17  8:54         ` John Dallaway
@ 2009-09-17 20:54         ` Jonathan Larmour
  2009-09-17 21:10           ` H Hartley Sweeten
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-09-17 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H Hartley Sweeten; +Cc: Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> 
>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>
>>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>
>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>
>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>>>made an assignment.
>>
>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
>>time to search right now).
> 
> 
> Does anyone know the status of this?
> 
> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
> original patch is still not in CVS.

I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an 
assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they 
never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus.

Jifl
-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-09-17 20:54         ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2009-09-17 21:10           ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-17 21:18             ` Austin, Brian
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-17 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Austin, Brian
  Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-09-17 21:10           ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-09-17 21:18             ` Austin, Brian
  2009-11-18 16:31               ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Austin, Brian @ 2009-09-17 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H Hartley Sweeten
  Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

Crap!  Sorry guys,

I'll mail that off.

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-09-17 21:18             ` Austin, Brian
@ 2009-11-18 16:31               ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-11-18 16:33                 ` Austin, Brian
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-11-18 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Austin, Brian
  Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
>
> Crap!  Sorry guys,
> 
> I'll mail that off.
> 

Hello Brian,

Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
port?

Thanks,
Hartley

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-11-18 16:31               ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-11-18 16:33                 ` Austin, Brian
  2009-11-19  9:37                   ` John Dallaway
  2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Jonathan Larmour
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Austin, Brian @ 2009-11-18 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H Hartley Sweeten
  Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

Hey guys,

I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.

I totally folded on this and am sorry,

Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
so I can sign it and send it off.

Sorry again for the fowlup.

Brian Austin

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
>
> Crap!  Sorry guys,
> 
> I'll mail that off.
> 

Hello Brian,

Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
port?

Thanks,
Hartley

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-11-18 16:33                 ` Austin, Brian
@ 2009-11-19  9:37                   ` John Dallaway
  2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Jonathan Larmour
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-11-19  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Austin, Brian; +Cc: eCos Maintainers

Hi Brian

Austin, Brian wrote:

> I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
> cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.
> 
> I totally folded on this and am sorry,
> 
> Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
> so I can sign it and send it off.

I suggest you try the Copyright Clerk e-mail address:

   copyright-clerk@fsf.org

John Dallaway

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-11-18 16:33                 ` Austin, Brian
  2009-11-19  9:37                   ` John Dallaway
@ 2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Jonathan Larmour
  2010-03-13  0:08                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2009-11-19 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Austin, Brian
  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

Austin, Brian wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
> cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.
> 
> I totally folded on this and am sorry,
> 
> Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
> so I can sign it and send it off.

Hi Brian,

This page gives you the form you need to fill in, and the email address 
for it go to. They'll then send you the paperwork again.

http://ecos.sourceware.org/ecos/assign.html

Thanks for contributing!

Jifl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
> 
>>Crap!  Sorry guys,
>>
>>I'll mail that off.
>>
> 
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
> FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
> port?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> 
>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
> 
> support?
> 
>>>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
> 
> it
> 
>>>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
> 
> clean
> 
>>>>>>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
> 
> patch.
> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
> 
> never
> 
>>>>>made an assignment.
>>>>
>>>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>>>timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
> 
> have
> 
>>>>time to search right now).
>>>
>>>
>>>Does anyone know the status of this?
>>>
>>>I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>>>original patch is still not in CVS.
>>
>>I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
> 
> submitted an 
> 
>>assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
> 
> they 
> 
>>never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
> 
> Cirrus.
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:
> 
> 
>>I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
> 
> for
> 
>>the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
> 
> to
> 
>>forward port the code base.
> 
> 
> Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
> bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
> confirmation
> from FSF.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
  2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2010-03-13  0:08                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2010-03-13  0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Larmour, Austin, Brian
  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten, Gary Thomas, ecos-patches, eCos Maintainers

Hello Brian,

Any update on this?

Regards,
Hartley 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@jifvik.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:38 AM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: H Hartley Sweeten; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers
Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

Austin, Brian wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
> cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.
> 
> I totally folded on this and am sorry,
> 
> Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
> so I can sign it and send it off.

Hi Brian,

This page gives you the form you need to fill in, and the email address 
for it go to. They'll then send you the paperwork again.

http://ecos.sourceware.org/ecos/assign.html

Thanks for contributing!

Jifl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
> 
>>Crap!  Sorry guys,
>>
>>I'll mail that off.
>>
> 
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
> FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
> port?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> 
>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
> 
> support?
> 
>>>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
> 
> it
> 
>>>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
> 
> clean
> 
>>>>>>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
> 
> patch.
> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
> 
> never
> 
>>>>>made an assignment.
>>>>
>>>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>>>timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
> 
> have
> 
>>>>time to search right now).
>>>
>>>
>>>Does anyone know the status of this?
>>>
>>>I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>>>original patch is still not in CVS.
>>
>>I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
> 
> submitted an 
> 
>>assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
> 
> they 
> 
>>never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
> 
> Cirrus.
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:
> 
> 
>>I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
> 
> for
> 
>>the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
> 
> to
> 
>>forward port the code base.
> 
> 
> Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
> bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
> confirmation
> from FSF.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-13  0:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909019173AD@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
2009-06-10 19:42 ` Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support Gary Thomas
2009-06-14 21:02   ` Jonathan Larmour
2009-06-15  1:19     ` Gary Thomas
2009-09-16 21:31       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-17  8:54         ` John Dallaway
2009-09-17 20:54         ` Jonathan Larmour
2009-09-17 21:10           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-17 21:18             ` Austin, Brian
2009-11-18 16:31               ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-11-18 16:33                 ` Austin, Brian
2009-11-19  9:37                   ` John Dallaway
2009-11-19 18:38                   ` Jonathan Larmour
2010-03-13  0:08                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-08-07 15:36   ` John Dallaway
2009-08-07 15:53     ` Austin, Brian
2009-08-07 16:19       ` John Dallaway

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).