From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24659 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2002 19:12:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24652 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2002 19:12:58 -0000 Subject: Re: Welcome to sources.redhat.com From: Gary Thomas To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Jonathan Larmour , eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <20020806185528.GE4434@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <20020806155646.18120.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <3D501063.6020204@ecoscentric.com> <20020806185528.GE4434@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-4) Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 12:12:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1028661177.17007.127.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 12:55, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > If you don't mind, for the time being, if you write your own patches can > > you still submit them for approval by any other maintainer anyway rather > > than going ahead and checking it in and just posting the patch? > > Should this be to ecos-patches or ecos-maintainers? > I'd say to ecos-patches. > A while ago i posted to ecos-patches a patch for the ftp client. Here > is what i want to commit: What's the purpose of the change? What about a ChangeLog entry?