From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1649 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2003 16:53:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1516 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2003 16:53:35 -0000 Subject: Re: [APPROVE] EB40 RedBoot doc patch for 2.0 branch From: Gary Thomas To: John Dallaway Cc: eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <200303191632.42131.jld@ecoscentric.com> References: <200303191632.42131.jld@ecoscentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-4) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1048092814.9579.5271.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:32, John Dallaway wrote: > Name: EB40 RedBoot doc patch > > Description: Tweaks to the instructions for installing RedBoot on an Atmel > AT91EB40 board. The existing instructions are misleading in places and the > length of the current ROMRAM images requires that the 'fis write' rune be > updated. > > Rationale: Doc patches are harmless providing they don't introduce build doc > errors. Without this patch, installation of RedBoot on the AT91EB40 board > according to the instructions will fail. > > Patch: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2003-03/msg00139.html IMO as long as the changes reflect the state of the branch, there needs to be no further discussion - certainly not for platform details, etc. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | MLB Associates | Consulting for the +1 (970) 229-1963 | Embedded world http://www.mlbassoc.com/ | email: | gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc ------------------------------------------------------------