From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16772 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2003 21:21:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16713 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2003 21:21:38 -0000 Subject: Re: [APPROVE?] GNU linkonce patch From: Gary Thomas To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <3E946EF6.7060704@eCosCentric.com> References: <3E946EF6.7060704@eCosCentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-4) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 21:21:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1049923296.22169.13967.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 13:05, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > I just sent a fix for an obvious typo in various linker scripts to > ecos-patches. A number of .ld files had .gnulinkonce.s instead of > .gnu.linkonce.s. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2003-04/msg00057.html > > It should be applied because a) it's obvious and b) without it people on > quite a few targets may not have working new/delete. The risks are zero > unless I had a finger fumble! > > Please someone say yes so I don't have to hang around worrying about > whether I'll forget to apply it! :-) They seem reasonable enough to me - although I don't have any machines to test on :-) Go for it. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | MLB Associates | Consulting for the +1 (970) 229-1963 | Embedded world http://www.mlbassoc.com/ | email: | gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc ------------------------------------------------------------