From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3621 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 16:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3614 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 16:20:22 -0000 Subject: Re: FWD: dhcp_prot.c: some fixes From: Gary Thomas To: Andrew Lunn Cc: eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <20030729160614.GR1334@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <20030729160614.GR1334@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MLB Associates Message-Id: <1059495621.10050.449.camel@hermes> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:20:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 10:06, Andrew Lunn wrote: > I don't claim to understand the subtleties of DHCP, but this looks OK > to me. Could some else take a look as well, particularly the second > hunk. I think it's OK. Of course, I agree that the magic which takes place when leases expire, etc, makes this a tough call. I trust that this guy has tested the change - he seems to be pretty good about things. -- Gary Thomas MLB Associates