From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27728 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2003 16:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27721 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2003 16:29:29 -0000 Subject: Re: [ECOS] How to build redboot/ecos? From: Gary Thomas To: Alex Schuilenburg Cc: eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <3F6F2048.9070906@ecoscentric.com> References: <1063752622.5547.472.camel@hermes> <3F6F1B9D.2020000@ecoscentric.com> <1064246821.1015.283.camel@hermes> <3F6F2048.9070906@ecoscentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MLB Associates Message-Id: <1064248165.1015.308.camel@hermes> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:29:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 10:16, Alex Schuilenburg wrote: > Gary Thomas wrote: > ... > >>>Really? Where? The only official source for eCos is: > >>> http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/ > >> > >>It is? > >> > >>I thought we were moving away from the RedHat based URL to the vendor > >>neutral http://ecos.sourceware.org/ > > > > > > Fair enough, but it surely isn't on sourceforge AFAIK. > > Source*ware*, not sourceforge. > > ecos.sourceware.org is simply an alias for s.r.c. and s.r.c. has been > set up to provide virtual hosting. Hence it is the same machine, just > not advertised as such. The gcc group use the same trick for gcc.gnu.org > > I suspect the announcement may have been be delayed until eCos falls > under the FSF umbrella so that ecos becomes also available as > http://ecos.gnu.org. The prefferred "official" URL, > ecos.gnu.org or ecos.sourceware.org, is up to you maintainers to decide :-) > Understood. I was just seeing if this guy actually got something from sourceforge (some clandestine project?) or was just confused. -- Gary Thomas MLB Associates