From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17452 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2004 09:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17428 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 09:51:45 -0000 Subject: Re: Update jffs2 from public MTD From: David Woodhouse To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: Andrew Lunn , eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <411CB477.2000201@eCosCentric.com> References: <20040812213722.GV9839@lunn.ch> <411CA0AC.9040307@eCosCentric.com> <411CB477.2000201@eCosCentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1092822701.14552.428.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2.dwmw2.1) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:51:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 13:30 +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Bart's just been telling me that he remembers David saying in the pub about > future JFFS2 contribs not being assigned. Sorry if I've forgotten that. So > is that still the case? Please don't use my @redhat.com address. Use the address which is run competently. I've only just received this mail -- in fact I've only just received all mail sent to dwmw2@redhat.com in the last couple of weeks. You are correct -- since Red Hat IS pulled the plug on my servers without giving me even enough time to wind down the DNS expiry and move them to a new home, I stopped requiring copyright assignment. They no longer own CVS JFFS2. -- dwmw2