From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11761 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2004 10:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11656 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 10:28:08 -0000 Subject: Re: Update jffs2 from public MTD From: David Woodhouse To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Jonathan Larmour , Andrew Lunn , eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <20040818101736.GK6981@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <20040812213722.GV9839@lunn.ch> <411CA0AC.9040307@eCosCentric.com> <411CB477.2000201@eCosCentric.com> <1092822701.14552.428.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20040818101736.GK6981@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1092824878.14552.432.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2.dwmw2.1) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:28:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 12:17 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > One thing to consider is maybe trying to get RedHat to contribute the > parts it owns to FSF when it transfers eCos. Would you be interested > in that? Would you be willing to require FSF copyright assingments for > jffs2? That works for me. In fact when I told Red Hat I was no longer going to collect copyright assignments for them for JFFS2, I had already suggested they might as well assign it to the FSF too, and I think they agreed. I'm not averse to collecting assignments to the FSF. -- dwmw2