From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10061 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2009 13:32:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 10046 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Mar 2009 13:32:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:31:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2ODVmAG001626; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:31:48 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2ODVgul013921; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:31:43 -0400 Received: from [10.11.13.200] (vpn-13-200.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.200]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2ODVlNe019472; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:31:47 -0400 Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 1000681] PXA GPIO registers not properly configured for detecting IRQs From: Mark Salter To: John Dallaway Cc: eCos Maintainers In-Reply-To: <49C7B0D3.6020904@dallaway.org.uk> References: <49C7B0D3.6020904@dallaway.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1237901506.28886.95.camel@deneb.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:54 +0000, John Dallaway wrote: > Forwarding to the ecos-maintainers list to ensure everyone sees this... > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Bug 1000681] PXA GPIO registers not properly configured for > detecting IRQs > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:44:13 +0000 > From: bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com > To: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org > References: > > http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000681 > > --- Comment #2 from John Dallaway 2009-03-23 15:44:13 --- > > Can one of the maintainers with PXA2xx experience please confirm that > this change is appropriate for all PXA2xx processors? Is there any > potential for breakage of platform HALs which were relying on the > previous behaviour? Looks right to me. This file actually had it right until this patch broke it: http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2005-12/msg00004.html --Mark