From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8502 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 05:17:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8493 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 05:17:21 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 2.117 (F2.6; T0.14; A1.46; B2.12; Q2.03) Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 22:17:00 -0000 From: "Andrew Lunn" To: ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: "Andrew Lunn" X-Epoch: 1025759840 X-Sasl-enc: PJl0j195fRBbTu/H7WJzxQ Subject: Patches not getting into the tree? Message-Id: <20020704051720.98EE76DA23@www.fastmail.fm> X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 I guys Whats happening about getting patches into the CVS tree? eg http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2002-06/msg00030.html has not made it in yet. Is mailing to ecos-patches enough or do we need to do more? Andrew -- http://fastmail.fm: send your email first class