From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-29-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30039 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 08:13:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30032 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 08:13:35 -0000
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 01:13:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Welcome to sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20020807081329.GL4434@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <20020806155646.18120.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <3D501063.6020204@ecoscentric.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D501063.6020204@ecoscentric.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Filter-Version: 1.6 (rubicon)
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

> I heard a good definition of a trivial patch as a patch that the
> most sadistic reviewer you know would still have no grounds of
> objecting to :-). The most extremely trivial patches sometimes don't
> even deserve a ChangeLog entry or patch to ecos-patches, but err on
> the side of caution for now. Otherwise, all changes should have a
> ChangeLog entry.

As you all know, my spelling/English is terrible. Please feel free to
correct ChangeLog entries, comments, etc. I have no problems with
this. Being dyslexic, i don't notice my errors. Such changes i think
fall into the trivial category. 

     Andrew