From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-93-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29528 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2002 09:09:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29493 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 09:08:55 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:09:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@jifvik.org>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Future code ownership
Message-ID: <20021217090748.GM350@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <3DFDF6B7.8090008@jifvik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DFDF6B7.8090008@jifvik.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Filter-Version: 1.6 (rubicon)
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2

> 3) A commercial entity interested in picking up the eCos "banner", such as 
> eCosCentric.

Does this mean eCosCentric is actually willing to do this?

Has Mind been approached? What is their opinion on this. 

    Andrew