From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@jifvik.org>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Future code ownership
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021217092616.GN350@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DFDF6B7.8090008@jifvik.org>
> 6) Software in the Public Interest, Inc. is a US not-for-profit
> organisation. <http://www.spi-inc.org/> Its goals are to advance open
> source. They are well known already as the copyright holders of many well
> known projects like Debian Linux, GNOME, LSB as well as owners of the Open
> Source marque, and so on. They are trusted. We have already taken the
> step of asking them in principle if they could accept eCos as a project,
> even with our funky licensing proposal outlined above. And as you can see
> from
> <http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/resolution-2002-10-08.mgs>
> this was accepted.
>
> Personally I favour this option. I think it is best for eCos as an Open
> Source project, and I would like to hope even Red Hat would be able to
> support it, as it would be in the long-term best interests of eCos.
> Besides if the licensing proposal does pay off, they would profit!
Has the opinion of RH been sought on this?
To me, this does seem like the best option.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-17 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-16 7:52 Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 0:44 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-17 19:57 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 1:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-17 15:24 ` Bart Veer
2002-12-18 0:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-19 5:09 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 19:54 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 20:00 ` Gary Thomas
2002-12-17 1:27 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2002-12-17 5:47 ` Gary Thomas
2002-12-17 9:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-17 8:52 ` Gary Thomas
2002-12-17 12:29 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 8:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-17 12:23 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 8:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-17 12:18 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-17 8:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-12-17 8:56 ` Gary Thomas
2002-12-17 12:00 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-12-19 11:52 Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-12-19 14:39 ` Bart Veer
2002-12-20 14:21 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-12-22 15:21 ` Bart Veer
2002-12-23 7:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2003-01-02 14:55 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-12 2:42 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-22 2:22 ` Jonathan Larmour
[not found] <3E145A86.5050601@eCosCentric.com>
2003-01-02 16:21 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021217092616.GN350@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch \
--to=andrew.lunn@ascom.ch \
--cc=ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jifl@jifvik.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).