From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-101-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21418 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2002 17:16:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21376 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 17:16:56 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:16:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Future code ownership
Message-ID: <20021217161405.GB1028@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <3DFDF6B7.8090008@jifvik.org> <20021217092616.GN350@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <1040132847.22212.1460.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1040132847.22212.1460.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Filter-Version: 1.6 (rubicon)
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

> Frankly, Red Hat's opinion should not matter.  They're the ones
> that caused all this ruckus in the first place.

It may not matter, but if they do agree it adds more weight to this
option.

        Andrew