From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28740 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 06:31:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28725 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 06:31:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 06:31:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos discussion , eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime Message-ID: <20030117063206.GA12094@redhat.com> Reply-To: ecos-discuss@sourceware.org References: <3E2738C2.8050900@eCosCentric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E2738C2.8050900@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: >It's not much warning, I would have given more, if I could. >but it's just been revealed that the long promised upgrade of >sources.redhat.com will take place this coming Saturday at: > >10am PST > 1pm EST > 6pm GMT > 7pm CET > >and no doubt other timezones :-). > >It will probably not return until Sunday morning. At a minimum it will be >three hours if everything goes well, but don't count on it. If it's not >up, it's not up. > >All services will be off-line at that point: no cvs, web, ftp, or mailing >lists. We can't even hear you scream ;-). > >It's definitely worth it as it will be a move to a much newer, faster and >larger machine. And one with a lot more net bandwidth, too. It's better in every way. Now, if *that* doesn't jinx me, nothing will. >That should make for a quiet weekend :). For some people, maybe. :-) cgf