From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-142-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30580 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 10:44:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30573 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 10:44:37 -0000
To: dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <26028.1043145216@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> (message from
	David Woodhouse on Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:33:36 +0000)
Subject: Re: rbtree licence dilemma
From: Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com>
References: <20030121101147.719AC6165C@delenn.bartv.net>  <3E2C9F52.70803@eCosCentric.com> <26028.1043145216@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20030121104447.D715E6165C@delenn.bartv.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:44:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

>>>>> "David" == David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:

    David> I assume this licence is more acceptable? :)

    David> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/sys/sys/tree.h?rev=1.7

That looks like vanilla current BSD, so yes.

Bart