Dear ecos-maintainers,


FYI, I forward a probably relevant discussion from the SPI list.

The comments of Ted Ts'o seem very relevant to me. How does the Redhat
Copyright assignment stand to this discussion (on "imdenification") ?

Also note the Ted explicitely suggests using a corporation (and not a not for 
profit) for holding Copyright, because it is much more capable of defending 
itself and holding the _persons_ non-liable.  e.g. in Belgium, all members 
of a not-for-profit, like the badminton club that I am a member of, are all, 
fully and individually liable if a player would get hurt, when playing without 
insurance, this covers both the "organizers" of the club, but even all 
individual members. 

Sorry I did send the full text (dont' know how to get the pointer to this
quickly).

Hope this helps,

Peter