From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-366-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32398 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 08:31:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31825 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 08:30:17 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:31:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@jifvik.org>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>,
   Alex Schuilenburg <alex@schuilenburg.org>
Subject: Re: Bugzilla
Message-ID: <20030423083001.GB21714@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <3EA5CFBD.5060204@jifvik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3EA5CFBD.5060204@jifvik.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Filter-Version: 1.6 (rubicon)
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2

> Here's what it looks like now: http://bugzilla.ecoscentric.com/ but 
> obviously it shouldn't be explicitly ecoscentric.com, so I suggest we 
> get bugs.ecos.sourceware.org and/or later on bugs.ecos.gnu.org set up 
> as aliases so no-one should know what machine it actually lives on. If 
> you look at the "new bug" page you can see Alex has even added all the 
> version numbers/platforms etc. so you can see what it looks like.

Its missing a few versions. eg anoncvs-head, 2.0-branch-head. 

> This would solve a lot of issues with bugzilla and will allow us to 
> customise it _exactly_ to our needs, so I'm very keen to do this. Has 
> anyone else any other suggestions or should I just go ahead and see 
> about getting bugs.ecos.sourceware.org sorted?

OK. 

    Andrew