From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29741 invoked by alias); 22 May 2003 07:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29615 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 07:31:52 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: ecos-opt Message-ID: <20030522073145.GS475@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <3ECBD40B.1080501@eCosCentric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ECBD40B.1080501@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (rubicon) X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 > As (ex-)Red Hat folks will remember, it was decided way way back to split > off the network stack and SNMP directories into a separate "ecos-opt" > hierarchy in the public CVS tree. And so it has remained to this day. How does fit in, if it does, with the idea of going towards lots of separate packages. This is something you eCosCentric guys keep mentioning, but have not really said much in detail in out in the open. It seems to me these things are going in opposite directions. Hence i think im missing some information.... Andrew