From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-504-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15334 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2003 12:34:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15324 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 12:34:39 -0000
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:34:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Doc on How to submit patches
Message-ID: <20030903123432.GK6488@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <3F5522F8.3030404@eCosCentric.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F5522F8.3030404@eCosCentric.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (ascomax)
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:08:40AM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Nick and myself have been working on this: 
> http://ecos.sourceware.org/patches.html
> 
> Comments? Corrections? Abuse?

The component to use in Bugzilla is "Patches and Contributions". Im
humming and harring as to if it would be better to use the component
the major part of the patch is in. That way it automagically gets a
default owner who we can point a finger at when the patch sits around
for a while with nothing happening. If the owner is overloaded its his
responsibility to then find another maintainer to take over the patch.

It would be nice to add a state "Waiting for assignment" to bugzilla.

   Andrew