From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-530-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11030 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2003 09:04:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11012 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 09:04:07 -0000
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:04:00 -0000
To: oyvind.harboe@zylin.com
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Patch: making integration of 16x5x and other UARTs easier
Message-ID: <20030923090402.GA2002@lunn.ch>
References: <003001c381ae$fc2658d0$73dea8c0@lair>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <003001c381ae$fc2658d0$73dea8c0@lair>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2

> If this patch gets accepted, I've got opencores.org 16x5x
> UART drivers that I'll submit as well. (I mailed assignment
> paperwork was mailed a while ago, but it still hasn't gone 
> through).

Actually, it has. At least we got notification from RedHat it had been
received.

        Andrew