From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11241 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2003 13:39:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11225 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 13:39:13 -0000 From: Mark Salter To: jifl@eCosCentric.com Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com, ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F8C80E0.1010808@eCosCentric.com> (message from Jonathan Larmour on Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:04:00 +0100) Subject: Re: ARM HAL exception handling References: <200310131818.30676.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <20031014072240.GA1885@lunn.ch> <3F8C80E0.1010808@eCosCentric.com> Message-Id: <20031015133821.EF2F878B9C@deneb.localdomain> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:39:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 >>>>> Jonathan Larmour writes: > Andrew Lunn wrote: >> Hi folks >> >> I don't know enough about thumb to deal with this patch. Please can >> someone else take a look. > Mark's the expert on this stuff AFAIK, but firstly it mostly only affects > #ifdef CYGHWR_HAL_ARM_DUMP_EXCEPTIONS stuff, so can't be too problematic. > Clearly the current stuff doesn't grok thumb at all. The change looks > reasonable. Yes, I agree. The changes look right to me. --Mark