From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23370 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2004 20:54:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23362 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 20:54:22 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:54:00 -0000 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: export of openssl from US _is_ legal Message-ID: <20040113205420.GM18959@lkcl.net> References: <20040113164244.GC18959@lkcl.net> <20040113164955.GK11709@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <20040113165509.GE18959@lkcl.net> <40044D77.1050509@eCosCentric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40044D77.1050509@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lkcl@lkcl.net X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:56:39PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > >>it. But as far as i know, its APITA to sort out. > > > > > > from what i understand, the notification - send an email - is > > sufficient. > > From our discussions with lawyers who claimed to be experts on this, it > unfortunately isn't that simple. It would be even harder to integrate it > into CVS due to the terms of the BAXA rules on notification, so it de > facto has to remain in an EPK anyway. *wide-eyed* - oo. pleased that you have access to lawyers!