From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-677-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16134 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 14:20:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16104 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 14:20:45 -0000
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:20:00 -0000
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
Cc: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs@ecoscentric.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: eCosCentric copyright hold in headers
Message-ID: <20040408142145.GL29940@lunn.ch>
References: <20040408101602.GJ29940@lunn.ch> <4075305D.8020101@eCosCentric.com> <20040408111939.GK29940@lunn.ch> <407556D4.8080407@ecoscentric.com> <40755B58.30905@eCosCentric.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40755B58.30905@eCosCentric.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2

Should we propose what the new banner looks like?

Is the basic format of the current banner  OK?

--- ChangeLog   2004-04-08 16:12:54.000000000 +0200
+++ ChangeLog.new       2004-04-08 16:17:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 // -------------------------------------------
 // This file is part of eCos, the Embedded Configurable Operating System.
 // Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Red Hat, Inc.
+// Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 //
 // eCos is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
 // the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
@@ -26,9 +27,6 @@
 //
 // This exception does not invalidate any other reasons why a work based on
 // this file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
-//
-// Alternative licenses for eCos may be arranged by contacting Red Hat, Inc.
-// at http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/ecos-license/
 // -------------------------------------------
 //####ECOSGPLCOPYRIGHTEND####
 //===========================================================================

The last bit clearly wants to go since its not been true for a long
while.

Should the original RedHat Copyright line be deleted as well? I guess
leaving it could confuse people into thinking the files are still
copyright RedHat as well as being FSF.. 

          Andrew