From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-734-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2567 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 10:23:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2559 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 10:23:37 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:23:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com>
Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: FWD: [ECOS] Problem with PowerPC cache init order
Message-ID: <20040621102330.GT29784@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <20040621095820.GD2031@lunn.ch> <m3d63tqkil.fsf@xl5.calivar.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3d63tqkil.fsf@xl5.calivar.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:21:22AM +0100, Nick Garnett wrote:
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:
> 
> > Hi Folks
> > 
> > Could somebody who knows about PPC caches take a look at this patch.
> > 
> >         Thanks
> >                 Andrew
> > 
> 
> I think this is OK. It seems to make sense to me, however I also share
> Mark's concern that this may not be applicable to all PowerPC parts.
> 
> Gary is probably more familiar with this code and the various PowerPC
> variants than I am at present, so I was hoping that he would give it a
> once over.

He is on Holiday at the moment. Hopefully he will take a look when he
is back.

   Andrew