From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-741-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31218 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2004 08:25:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31137 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 08:25:24 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:25:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs@ecoscentric.com>
Cc: ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: Re: New Assignment: AFTEK
Message-ID: <20040628082518.GA1435@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <40DFD273.6010104@ecoscentric.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40DFD273.6010104@ecoscentric.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> Attached.
> 
> And before anyone asks, this is all that was sent in two seperate 1 page 
> faxes.  The fax was stored electronically so the address resolution is a 
> result of the sender's fax scanner. No list of files was provided.

Mostly useless...

We need to track down what this is for. I've no idea. It does not fit
to any contribution i know of which is in the pipeline. 

Googling for "aftek infosys eCos" only produces two old hits. If you
can make out the senders FAX numbers could you send a FAX back asking
them to telephone/email you so we can get this straightened out.

     Andrew