From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4509 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2004 10:17:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4430 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 10:17:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:17:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: David Woodhouse Cc: Jonathan Larmour , Andrew Lunn , eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: Update jffs2 from public MTD Message-ID: <20040818101736.GK6981@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <20040812213722.GV9839@lunn.ch> <411CA0AC.9040307@eCosCentric.com> <411CB477.2000201@eCosCentric.com> <1092822701.14552.428.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1092822701.14552.428.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:51:42AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 13:30 +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > > Bart's just been telling me that he remembers David saying in the pub about > > future JFFS2 contribs not being assigned. Sorry if I've forgotten that. So > > is that still the case? [..] > You are correct -- since Red Hat IS pulled the plug on my servers > without giving me even enough time to wind down the DNS expiry and move > them to a new home, I stopped requiring copyright assignment. They no > longer own CVS JFFS2. Hi David One thing to consider is maybe trying to get RedHat to contribute the parts it owns to FSF when it transfers eCos. Would you be interested in that? Would you be willing to require FSF copyright assingments for jffs2? Its something that must be acted on quickly if you think this is a good idea. We would have to get assignments for the recent changes which are not owned by RedHat. Andrew