From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-maintainers-return-809-listarch-ecos-maintainers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29522 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2004 10:52:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-maintainers-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29510 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2004 10:52:04 -0000
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:52:00 -0000
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
To: Andrea Michelotti <amichelotti@atmelroma.it>
Cc: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com>,
   ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: Re: jtst ecos porting
Message-ID: <20040917105150.GS26759@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
References: <05af01c49ca3$0ee2bf80$0b0110ac@ipitec.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <05af01c49ca3$0ee2bf80$0b0110ac@ipitec.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:42:41PM +0200, Andrea Michelotti wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
> I re-posted jtst ecos porting patch to you, I aligned it with the current
> status of cvs.
> But it's becoming difficult to follow ATMEL sites and some customer that ask
> updated version of eCos with the jtst port.
> I know you are very very busy; I would like only to know (to do my
> schedules) when do you think this port could be integrated into CVS.

Hi Andrea

How does this port stand in terms of copyright transfer? You or Atmel
are not apper on our list of people with copyright agreements. 

Please could you take a look at http://ecos.sourceware.org/assign.html

       Thanks
          Andrew