From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17775 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2006 17:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 17719 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2006 17:13:27 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:13:24 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GLjus-00082b-00; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:13:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:13:00 -0000 To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: FSF status Message-ID: <20060908171322.GA30345@lunn.ch> References: <20060908091947.GE25338@lunn.ch> <4501A25C.8010704@eCosCentric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4501A25C.8010704@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Andrew Lunn Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 > The only reason we can't use their standard assignment template is that it > assigns all code in "eCos" which is something eCosCentric cannot be > expected to do as eCosCentric develops extensions to eCos which are not to > be assigned. Are there any other FSF projects which have a commercial company associated? Like Wine/crossover office? Could you could find such a setup which have already been through this process and use there assignemt. Ask the company for a copy of what they used. You would then have a strong position to argue from that the FSF accepted this exact wording before, so there is no need for the legal people to be really involved..... Andrew