From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20034 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2008 10:36:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 20025 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2008 10:36:16 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch (HELO rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch) (139.79.129.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:35:43 +0000 Received: from eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch (eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch [139.79.100.1]) by rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2AAZdWE000906; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:35:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from [139.79.100.143] (helo=donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch) by eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1JYfLx-0003vW-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:35:33 +0100 Received: from lunn by donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1JYfM2-0006Gu-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:35:38 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:36:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos Maintainers Subject: Re: EL/IX Message-ID: <20080310103538.GA23194@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> References: <47D50D76.4020608@eCosCentric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D50D76.4020608@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:29:10AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > The sourceware overseers are agitating for removing the EL/IX project since > it's extremely dead. They have a point. > > http://sourceware.org/elix/ > > However we refer to it in a few places from our docs. > > Should I either: > 1) object entirely? > 2) Incorporate the EL/IX spec into the eCos project? > or > 3) Just remove all our EL/IX references. > > Personally I think 3. It's time to just face up to the fact it's dead. I agree. Remove all references. Andrew