From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27259 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2008 11:58:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 27250 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2008 11:58:04 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_14,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:57:47 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1KJoak-0003MS-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:57:42 +0200 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: J?rgen Lambrecht Cc: ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: AT91 Message-ID: <20080718115742.GA24316@lunn.ch> References: <48808390.9040106@televic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48808390.9040106@televic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact ecos-maintainers-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-maintainers-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:50:40PM +0200, J?rgen Lambrecht wrote: > We work with AT91 ARM chips. I can help there. > OK, now I have a clear deadline to commit a (nearly ;-) bugfree at91 > EMAC ethernet driver. Help with AT91 platforms would be great. I have AT91SAM7X-EK and AT91SAM7S-EK boards. What i don't have is any boards with external memory interfaces. Without that, using the FreeBSD stack is impossible, which is why you have found all these EMAC issues. So if you can test on bigger AT91 systems that would be great. Also, please don't leave you patch to the last minute. We need to work on a clean way to handle the copy from SDRAM into SRAM for your platform without imposing it on other AT91 devices which don't need it. This might take a couple of iterations to get right. Andrew